Raw materials
Since Kingston Taiwan is a memory assembly plant, materials are made at other Kingston facilities, or purchased from outside manufacturers, and shipped to the Hsin-Chu plant for assembly.
Incoming raw materials - PCB's and memory chips - are received, segregated and tested for compliance with quality specifications prior to release to manufacturing.
When released by Quality Assurance, raw components are assembled on carts by job and moved to the manufacturing floor for assembly and testing.
This part of the Kingston design allows tremendous flexibility and quick turnaround of custom memory orders.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
48 Comments
View All Comments
KTCSkins - Wednesday, June 22, 2005 - link
Thank you for all the comments. Good to know what is happening out there. I won't try and defend our testing in another email. We do indeed test 100 percent of our products and from day one.OCMAN - Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - link
Found this on Kingston site http://www.kingston.com/company/videos/mfg/module.... to see production and testing on video. Vid shows machine testing, with that I think the 100% testing is believeable. You should have included this in the link WesleyOCMAN - Tuesday, June 21, 2005 - link
Jbog - Monday, June 20, 2005 - link
I do not think it has anything to do with logic. Unless it was specified on package that the ram does not work on Asus P4P800 board at CAS 2, they had no reason to refuse RMA. Sounds like they dropped the ball.Depending on when Kingston started testing 100% of their rams, this article may well be a PR campaign.
MrMuk7 - Saturday, June 18, 2005 - link
They worked at slower speeds. Or at 400mhz with cas 2.5.The tech support said that they would only work at cas3 on my motherboard. The modules said they would work at cas2.
Kingston refused the RMA since they said there could be no guarantee that they would work at rated speeds on a Asus P4P800 board. I really don't understand their logic, since Ive ran lots of different Cas2 memory on this board.
cryptonomicon - Saturday, June 18, 2005 - link
i wonder what they use to test their ram. probably some proprietary testing program?Zepper - Saturday, June 18, 2005 - link
My recent experience with Kingston hasn't been too good either. Out of the 4 Kingston Value Ram modules I have personally had in my hands, one was DOA and another died in under six months. The other two seem to be working OK right now..bh.
Eskimo - Friday, June 17, 2005 - link
The author made two references in his article and one in the comments section regarding Kingston manufacturing wafers. To the best of my knowledge Kingston has no wafer manufacturing capability itself. They are an assembler who purchases the memory chips from Samsung, Micron, Infineon, Winbond and the other DRAM manufacturers.I think the article is a little misleading in that regard. The only link I can see between Kingston and wafer manufacturing is a $50 million investment they made in Elpida (formerly Hitachi and NEC semi operations)
Jbog - Friday, June 17, 2005 - link
Do you remember exactly what model Hyper X memory you threw in your trash and when the throwing incident took place? Do you also remember when you bought them?"Bought 2x512MB Hyper X. It would not even work Cas2 at 400Mhz (rated speed),..."
Did they work at any other speeds or did they not work at all?
"They said it would only work at CAS3,"
Was that what the tech support say or was that the specification that was specified on that particular Hyper X modules?
"Anyways, since the stick wouldnt work I couldn't sell it so I just threw this crap memory in the trash. I am not lying. My roommate saw me."
So Kingston refused RMA? If so, for what reason?
And for KTCSkins, when did Kingston start testing 100% of all their memory modules?
Icehawk - Friday, June 17, 2005 - link
It all depends on what you want to get out of it.Kingston is used by some big corporations for all their memory needs/upgrades - the quality of their regular RAM is quite good. I've encountered very few problems with Kingston RAM in OEM-type machines.